Friday, May 21, 2010

Hw #58- Parenting 102

Well, I wasn't in class for the guest speaker =\ I actually was very interested in hearing what he/she would have to say, so I guess I'll read other students blogs once it's posted to get filled in. If I can get a good idea of the points made, I'll add them in to this.

I feel like my "interview" with my mom I actually covered in parenting 101 part 1, but I'll synthesize what she said minus the self exposure lol:

-Breast Feeding is crucial for women who are healthy and can provide it. It has many benefits, not only a bonding experience, but also a natural choice. Baby formula seeks to imitate what women have naturally, and they still don't succeed. When a child is ready to add supplements to the milk diet, avoid pre mixed baby food. There are preservatives and pesticides that are not the healthiest. My mom opted to blend organic fruit into her own mixtures for both my sister & I. She even attributes a good relationship with food as starting here.

-She believed in speaking to us as adults, and telling the truth as oppose to making up stories. The benefit of this was that we knew we could count of her to be honest, and therefore we felt motivated to do the same with her. As I've said before, I don't lie to my mother about who I'm with, where I am or what I'm doing to this day, so I am inclined to think she's right.

-People often make the mistake of over-parenting and over-stimulating. My mom always says it takes a lot more work to screw a child up than to help a child flourish. While shopping for my cousin's baby shower last week, we had a discussion: When you walk into stores like Buy Buy Baby, it's extremely intimidating. It huge, with aisles and aisles of everything baby. As an expecting mom, just walking in the place must send you into panic. You become sold on the idea that you need all of these products in order for your child to grow and develop, when this is straight up FALSE. Children are born with all the developmental equipment they need, and they are born with the skills to learn. When instead of allowing this process to happen, you plop these manufactured distractions in front of them, it's actually hindering them from their natural ability, and if done repetitively, this can be permanent. A child needs person to person interaction and alone time to interact with their body, their thoughts, and the natural (pre-existing) environment around them.

Just like your child doesn't need breathing lessons when they leave the womb, it's important that parents trust that their child's development can come that naturally without prompting, forcing, or formal instruction. It actually builds the child's confidence when they are able to figure things out, and it's a good feeling to accomplish something. The kid wants to experience this over and over, so they will naturally keep absorbing and learning and discovering without exaggerated effort on the parents part.

The worst thing a parent can do is stifle the child's natural potential and spoon feed them material. The child won't be exercising their analytical skills to help them figure out the world around them, and they will probably grow tired and irritated with this boring, tedious and draining practice. As oppose to natural learning, forced learning will cause the child to feel poorly about themselves because they appear to not be meeting your expectations. This could lead them to be disillusioned with the idea of learning, all before school age. And as we learned in the previous unit, we can't exactly count on schools to reverse that, instead it'll probably increase resentment of institutionalized learning as well. And then you got a problem; a person who doesn't enjoy learning in school, or on their spare time. This type of person will be all too happy to simply get lost in their distractions, like TV. This type of person can also be easily convinced to consume. And then when they are pregnant, and are taking a stroll in Buy Buy baby....

Sold.

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Hw #57- Parenting 101

Part I- Don't know where to start, Just a ramble of my experiences with parenting

There were many good parts to how I was parented, and I really think my mom had a wisdom to her parenting style with me. I'm her first child, and she had me at 23. Even though she was young, in a new country, and married to a man who she was just really discovering, I think she did an excellent job.

My mom believed in many things. One was breast feeding. My mom felt that since she was healthy and able to, she should. She felt very anti-formula, and she breast fed me until I was about a year and a half. Part of the reason she felt so strongly about breast feeding is because it's natural, and she extended this to my food beyond milk as well. She refused to buy pre mixed "baby food" mush, and opted to blend me her own mix of organic fruits, and fruit that my uncle would give us from his garden. She felt this was more natural, and eliminated the vast majority, if not all, of the pesticides and preservatives that are in pre-mixed baby foods. She did this because that's how my grandmother parented her, so it was kind of something passed down. She never read parenting guides because she felt they were just like fads; one day this was in, the next day that was in.

My mom was unemployed for the first 3 years of my life (not by necessarily by choice) and she spent all that time with me. She would put me in the sling and do all her errands with me. She would talk to me constantly, and share her feelings with me although technically I was too young to understand. One thing my mother always did was speak to me like an adult. When I was a toddler, and asked her questions, she would always be honest with me, and took her time to explain why something was the way it was, instead of making up stories. She also would read to me every day, and we'd go to the park whenever it was nice out. She'd put a record on (we had the old school player) and we'd dance together until we collapsed on the couch.

I didn't watch that much TV. It ranged from none to an hour a day. My mom never put a limit on it, but I would much rather be helping her cook and do laundry, because it was more time to talk and laugh, and emulate my mother. But I also liked to just play independently and get lost in my own world and thoughts. My mom thought it was important to just leave me alone, and respect my time. She considered it a big part of development, because a child shouldn't be bombarded with stimulation at all times, contrary to what American mainstream views show. When a child gets time to be alone and embrace solitude for a couple hours, they get the chance to develop as an individual and they get the time to think without being prompted, analyze what they see, and come to the discoveries themselves instead of always being told and taught by others.

We didn't have a lot of money, but I don't feel like I missed out on anything. Sure we weren't able to do some things, and we lived in a 1 room apartment, but honestly I still remember the warm feeling I had as a child. My mom made everything ok, and even when our hot water would get cut off and we'd have to boil water to fill the tub, it felt like an adventure.

Overall, I would say my mother's parenting style was being very open with me, making me feel safe and loved enough to do the same, and just letting me develop naturally. My mother always says that a child is born wanting to learn, inquisitive, curious, kind hearted and confident, and that it takes a lot to screw that up. She says unfortunately, that's exactly what many people do. She always believed that I would learn how to read naturally, and that I would naturally want to do what she could do when she read me stories. She didn't think I needed a "Baby Einstein" intervention. She was right. Just like with reading, my mom always let me move at my own pace, put no pressures on me to be or do anything, and always supported me.

Being that my sister was born when I was 11, we have a big age difference, and I feel like I have already explored my own parenting style a bit. Because my mother now works demanding hours, and my father is no longer at home with us, I have played a big role in raising my sister. Yes, this responsibility bumped school out of being my first priority, but I am so grateful to have a sister like her, and I thank God every day since she was born. She has often been the reason I've kept trudging forward, and for her I can and would do anything. When I have a bad day, or when I get down on myself, I remind myself of her face, and her smile, her laugh, and I know that the world in it's core is a wonderful place, even if due to cruel, sick people, there are many things wrong with it. I know that she needs me, more than anyone in this world, and so I have made a promise that I will be there.

The way that I "parent" her draws all the positives from my mother, but also I have more patience than my mother did. I don't get frustrated with her, or take anger out on her. I love to talk with her, and I can happily spend hours with her. She is so happy and full of life, that she really does energize me and heal me, as much as I help her, and support her.

Part II- Responding to texts

"When parenting theories backfire"- Hahaha....this article made me laugh. It seems kind of odd to me though that you would create a situation of there being 2 choices, without really having a legitimate reason. Why does it matter what color cup the child drinks out of? In fact, by creating a scenario where the child must pick between two different color cups, you are sending the message to your child that the color of the cup is important, and it matters which one they get. Then when the child starts to be selective about the color, you become frustrated, and the child is confused because they are getting mixed messages. So then they cry and scream, and flip the script. You can't blame them; it's really on the parents here to stop trying to manipulate and encourage mind games.

I think its best to simply give a child a cup you select. If they on their own request a specific one, I would check to see if it's clean and available, and give it to them to respect their preference. If it's not, I would explain that right now the cup is dirty and being washed, and we cannot drink from it. I would go on to explain to them about bacteria and germs- a concept that's new and interesting, and will help them to understand why they can't have it. I would be patient and answer all their questions, all the while they will be drinking from the available cup that I selected, without fuss, because they understand that your on their team, and are not challenging them, nor do they need to challenge you.

This whole choices strategy described in the article I feel is infective because it boils down to the fact that it intentionally enforces that you are the authority; you provide the 2 choices. In an adults mind, they believe they are fooling the child into thinking they have the authority, because they make the final selection between the two. But children are much more intelligent than that: they understand the message you are sending them, and want to exercise the power you are seemingly presenting them with, which is why they will reach for that third choice you didn't provide. They're like OK, if I'm really in control, how about I pick an option 3. Then, when your refusal to let them pursue option 3 is shown, you confirm that you where not really giving them power. This can even lead to a sense of general mistrust if conditioned over time, because you are sending them the message that even their own parents seek to manipulate them into control. As the child matures, if this pattern is consistent and begins to apply to matters more significant than the color of a sippy cup, the damage can run deeper because the child will no longer feel it's a safe place to express themselves, and they might begin to withhold themselves from you. Then you are left with teens who you don't really know, broken communication, and are begging to try to get through to them. So you do what seems "reasonable": impose stricter rules and shows of authority. By now this is like the old song and dance for them; they will resist and rebel and choose the "third option" so to speak, until adulthood when they will be able to hopefully understand your good intentions behind it all, and rebuild communication.

But why go down this path? Respect them from the get go, and don't get muddled in manipulative strategies. I believe it's not necessary, or beneficial, to enforce that you are the authority. When they are young, simply the more developed functionality that you have will demonstrate to them that you are capable of many things they have yet to learn. From this alone, they will respect your position, if you respect theirs (being of course that it's safe to them and those around them). On the flip side, don't let them feel authority over you either. Be firm when you have good reason, but always explain your thought process and answer their questions truthfully. Ideally, the parent-child relationship should just be a union of 2 near equals who love each other, respect each other, are honest, open, and straightforward. I honestly believe this will ensure a good foundation for a close relationship well beyond childhood years.

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Hw #56- Interviews & Survey Questions

Part I- Questions:

-In what specific ways does the structure of your family mimic the structure of our society?

-As a child, did you have a fantasy of your romantic future? If so, what was the basic jist of it?

-Have you been disappointed with the actuality of romance? In what specific ways have your unmet expectations affected your relationships and your own reactions to your partner(s)?

-What does love mean for you? What qualities/role must your chosen partner fulfil?

-Have you ever been in love? How do you know; can you identify the qualities unique to romantic love?

-What would you say you get out of romantic love? In other words, why do you want it? When thinking about your future, does it play a big role, and if so, how?

-Do you want to create your own nuclear family? Why or why not? Or alternately, if you have already created one, why did you choose to do so, and what has your experience been? Would you change anything given what you know now? What advice do you have?

Part II- Interviews:

*Up soon

Part III- Analysis:

*Up soon

Part IV- Survey Question:

Do you feel like Disney movies and other such media have given you unrealistic expectations of love?

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Hw #55- Independent Research

Part I-

I'm not sure yet which aspect of personal relationships I want to focus on, but based on the research I do/feedback I get I will choose one of them.

Regarding family:

What aspects of the nuclear family unit are essential and significant in sustaining society and economic stability? What specific repercussions, if any, would occur if the nuclear family no longer existed?

Regarding romantic relationships:

What are the primary reasons that cause a woman to fantasize and idealize marriage (picture herself as a Disney princess), when her male counter part who has been exposed to many of the same movies does not hold such a fantasy (doesn't see himself as a Disney prince)?
Can this difference in mentality, expectations, and approach to romantic relationships be the reason why divorce is so common? Is it possible that instead of inspiring happy unions, Disney has actually contributed to divorce rates?

Or

Is romantic love universal? In what ways does the definition/role of a romantic partner alter with culture? Is then what we experience as "true" romantic love authentic or conditioned?

Part II-

Carol,
I think your question is interesting; you assert that because different people require different things from us, we often develop multiple faces/ personas to satisfy each need as it arises. You then ask where that leaves the "real" us.

Hm, I'm not sure that there is very much of us that is pure, untouched and unmolded from family/friends/lovers/larger society. It is hard to know what is instinctive and what is a learned belief or practice. We embody identities that are chosen for us, and as young people growing up we are encouraged to fit into the parts of society and our families that need filling. We wear many hats; it is not a far fetched possibility that we all have a less exaggerated version of multiple personality disorder. This can't be too healthy. I imagine it's hard to keep up, and can put a strain on relationships if you mess up and carry the wrong side of your persona to the wrong person ("Your not the same person I met 6 months ago!!" Etc.). This could also happen if you decide that one "mask" suits you better than the rest.

Your question kind of ties into mine, which asks if Disney expectations of romantic relationships contribute to divorce. Seeing as we both focus on expectations, what do you think the root of the expectations you're focusing on are? It would be helpful to identify the source, and add it as an aspect in your analysis.

Looking at your revised question, one thing you could develop more is what specific type of relationships are you investigating? I believe narrowing it down to either family, friends or romantic would allow you to make the question more specific, and therefore have a stronger topic. Also think about the changing of personas; is this a conscious thing, or do you believe it occurs as an automatic routine that lies in the subconscious?

Good job so far!


Juliette,
I think you have a great topic. Almost everyone has something to say for why people cheat, and it often fuels debates. You give two theories for why you believe people stray; they have fallen in love with another person but don't want to tell their partner, and that they simply might feel entitled to "have" anyone they want.

While both of these theories might hold some truth, I would suggest narrowing your question down quite a bit so that through your research you are able to gain interesting insights. When you say "people", what demographic are you talking about? Is it men, or women? Is it someone who is married to the partner they cheat on, or not? Is it middle aged couples with kids, or teenagers? I think specifying the gender and age group is important because the reason why men cheat might be different then why women cheat, and the age group is key because at different stages in life, one might have different motives to cheat. In addition, married people might also have a different set of reasons that draw them to cheat, than an unmarried couple. You can even take into consideration economic status, which no doubt will have an effect on how available an affair is, as well as the reasons they choose to pursue one.

Looking at your analysis, one thing you could develop is extending your topic to how it ties into the larger picture. Maybe you could look into how children whose parents cheat are affected. Or maybe you could explore the idea of monogamy as whole; what causes us to want it and value it, and why is it important in sustaining a romance and family (or isn't, depending on your view).

Good job so far!


Part III-

What aspects of the nuclear family unit are essential and significant in sustaining society and economic stability? What specific repercussions, if any, would occur if the nuclear family no longer existed?

First Source:

Richard Eyre "True or false: Family is the basic unit of society". Deseret News (Salt Lake City). FindArticles.com. 16 May, 2010. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4188/is_20031214/ai_n11428182/

This Article examines the significance family holds in sustaining a society, and also approaches the topic of what would happen if this "basic unit" did not exist, in order to question if it really is so crucial after all. The article points out that communism attempted to make the commune the "basic unit" and use parents for creative purposes only, while the commune served to nurture the development of children. The article then goes on to analyze the effectiveness of this versus the traditional family. This article is helpful in identifying the specific areas where more research can be conducted to gain a solid understanding of societal dependence on the family.

Second source:


This article examines the historical importance of marriage & nuclear family on the economy. It explains that having a nuclear family allowed there to be stability in the agricultural society that existed. A regular workforce for the farm was grown at home; the family. This article is helpful in identifying the past significance of family on economic stability, and you would know what to look into next after reading this.
_________________________________________________________________

What are the primary reasons that cause a woman to fantasize and idealize marriage (picture herself as a Disney princess), when her male counter part who has been exposed to many of the same movies does not hold such a fantasy (doesn't see himself as a Disney prince)?
Can this difference in mentality, expectations, and approach to romantic relationships be the reason why divorce is so common? Is it possible that instead of inspiring happy unions, Disney has actually contributed to divorce rates?

First source:


This article points out that in almost every Disney movie, one or both of the parents of the young woman is dead or absent, and she then goes on to seek and succeed in founding a proper nuclear family. The author also provides a theory for what Disney movies require of their princess' to be in order to find her prince: "Good + beautiful + passive + comatose + white or self-abnegating + long-suffering girl = handsome rich prince. The other alternative for females is to be active, aggressive, ugly, independent and tortured." This article is very useful in pointing out some critical patterns throughout all of the Disney movies.


This article examines how the fantasy a girl creates in her head about her own Disney-like love story go from being innocent daydreams to big disappointments as she becomes a woman. The article describes how a woman is often left feeling disheartened with the world because love seemed so perfect as a child, but now that she has known heartbreak, has developed trust issues and insecurities that would seem foreign to the little girl who thought she could conquer the world. It's helpful in the sense that it makes the issue personal, and also it makes you wonder why something that will cause girls more grief and insecurity can be so promoted. Maybe it's because as long as they make us feel bad and insecure, we will consume their products to make us a better "princess", because surely that's the reason prince charming hasn't shown up yet....
________________________________________________________________

Is romantic love universal? In what ways does the definition/role of a romantic partner alter with culture? Is then what we experience as "true" romantic love authentic or conditioned?

First source:


This article is details extremely well the chemistry of attraction, human reproductive and divorce patterns, as well as cultural conditioning. It includes results to studies conducted from various standpoints including neurological, psychological and culture specific. It seeks to look at romantic love through all lenses. It's very helpful because it includes an extensive bibliography with links to more research conducted.

Second source:


This is a list of 14 books that question if romantic love is "true" and universal. It includes a summary of each book, and topics discussed/points made within the book. At the bottom of the page it also provides links for one of the books which has several chapters available online. It is very very useful in terms of knowing which books target which arguments. From there a google search of the book/ author should give you more depth.

Sunday, May 9, 2010

HW #54- Jung Test Results

INFP - "Questor". High capacity for caring. Emotional face to the world. High sense of honor derived from internal values. 4.4% of total population.
Free Jung Personality Test (similar to Myers-Briggs/MBTI)


The results of this test I felt were accurate. It was useful to see the percentage of each category. My breakdown was:

Introverted (54.55%) vs Extroverted (45.45%)
Intuitive (55.17%) vs Sensing (44.83%)
Feeling (71.43%) vs Thinking (28.57%)
Perceiving (51.61%) vs Judging (48.39%)

It's funny that the difference between my feeling side and my thinking side is such a landslide. Every one who knows me well will tell you this is very true. I'm known to all my family and friends as being "soft". I get very sentimental, and to be honest I am extremely sensitive. When others around me are sad, I literally absorb their sadness. Even as a 5 year old, I would sometimes catch crying spells from other people, even when I had personally been happy just a little while before. Also when watching a movie or hearing a story that touches me, I can't stop thinking about it for days. I become so involved, and I feel the emotions like they happened to me. This is going to sound "lame" to some people, but when I was sick on Friday, I came across Brokeback Mountain on TV. It's one of my favorites, so I watched it. By the end I was crying like a baby, and continued a full 20 min after the movie ended. While other people tear up, I'm going full speed. I used to be embarrassed/shy admitting this, but I can't change who I am. Another movie that gets me in this way is The Changeling. When Carol & I saw it we were both reduced to tears several times (haha I blew your spot carol =p).

In a case of a debate/ conflict, all someone has to do to win me over to that side is the emotional aspect. I respond to pathos above anything. I know people who are not close to me probably do not see this side of me, but to be honest its the main side of me. The truth is I am very guarded and private, and I'd like to keep myself, well, to myself. Of course to the people I'm close to, I open up. But otherwise, I don't. So when I interact with others on a superficial level, I keep it as just that. I try to just be a generic person. I may even come across as cold, sarcastic, and a load of other things which I definitely can't identify with. My dad especially complains that I am a very cold person, and that no one around me would know I cared. My extended family who I am not close to, often warns that when I get in a relationship, even if he is the perfect guy I would not show any affection. That kind of worries me that they think this, because it couldn't be further from what I feel inside. It's something I've struggled with my whole life; how do I show/ express to others the depth of what I'm actually feeling? I feel like with a few people I have gotten to that point, but I want to know how is it possible to be this way with everyone? To give them a sense of how I am, yet not reveal too much. I guess this is the problem.

I guess this would also qualify me as introverted, like the test says. I really do need my alone time. I actually like spending time by myself. It gives me the chance to listen to what I want and what I'm feeling. It's not uncommon for me to just spend hours thinking. About me, about other people, about life in general. I'm not saying my thoughts are profound; I'm definitely no genius. But I sure do have a lot of them. Recently insomnia has been running my life. When I lay down around 12, I don't fall asleep until 2 or 3. I'm not necessarily stressed, I'm just thinking. Since I'm so busy during the day, the night is my time for me. I kind of divide it between thinking and sleeping, which causes me to be extra tired. But I can't deny myself that time or else I'd probably go crazy. On the other hand, when I am done being alone, I am done. I want to be around people, or else I get really lonely, to the point where it creeps me out.

Hm, now to intuitive. Well I'd like to think that I am. I have kinda have this knowing of who to trust and who not to trust. Who I would be friends with, and for how long, even from the first time I meet them. I also know what problems a potential relationship will have, and I kind of know how far it will go, or if it's right for me. So far, the answer has been no on all counts (sigh), so I haven't bothered to enter something for the short term that's all wrong for me anyway. But I know people far more intuitive than myself, so I don't feel all special. For example, my mother's best friend is super intuitive. That woman is amazing with what she can get from people. I swear it verges on psychic. She met my cousin when she was engaged to this guy Steve, and she told us that they would never get married, but that she would meet another man within a year, marry, and have a child with him. But that they would divorce. Low and behold, the engagement with Steve broke off, she met Dimitri 3 months later, he proposed a few months after that, they are now married, and she is pregnant. They are also having major problems. Who really would have been able to say all of that?

As for perceiving vs. judging, I must say I'm a little disappointed the numbers where so close. I consider myself to be very open minded, and my knee jerk reaction would be to say I generally reserve judgment. But if I am to be honest, I would say that yes, I am open minded, but I also uphold myself and others to certain moral standards. To me doing the "right thing" is everything. This can even be in simple things like if someone gives you too much money by accident, you give them back the excess. It really truly disturbs me when someone would be greedy enough not to. I guess in this sense I am judgmental, because after a person does one or two things I deem not right, it does change my perception of them. This is NOT to say that there haven't been times where I haven't disappointed myself, or that I don't have so much more to learn, fix, and resolve about myself. I don't think that ever ends; perfection is unattainable, but it is important to keep developing nonetheless. What I am trying to say is that in my core, I believe I am a good person, and I really do allow my moral compass to guide me (corny, corny, but true).

I guess this test has been helpful in getting me to identify key aspects of who I am. It affirms my belief about certain things such as career path, and life goals. It also makes me question certain things, like how I can conquer my fears, and how I can be more transparent when it comes to my interaction with others...

Right now, I am safely opaque.